ABSORPTION VS VARIABLE COSTING LECTURE

BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS



Absorption Costing vs Variable Costing



Remember: An asset is a resource of the company that gives a future economic benefit. Inventories are assets because they give future benefits to the company in the terms of sales revenue.



Absorption costing: includes all manufacturing costs --- including direct materials, direct labor, and BOTH variable and fixed manufacturing overhead.



Absorption Costing = Full Costing



Under absorption costing, fixed overhead is a product cost until sold.



Absorption costing makes no distinction between fixed and variable costs thus is not suited for CVP analysis.



Sales less Absorption Cost of Goods Sold will equal Gross Profit



Functional Analysis of the Income Statement



Variable costing: includes only variable manufacturing costs --- direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead.



The entire amount of fixed costs are expenses in the year incurred.



When calculating Contribution Margin, Variable Cost of Goods Sold and Variable Selling and Administrative Expenses and subtracted from Sales.



Behavioral Analysis of the Income Statement



Variable costing can be used for Cost Volume Profit (Break-even Analysis)

Rules about Absorption Costing versus Variable Costing.



Rules about unit sales and production under the two costing methods.



If sales are variable and production constant.

a. When production is equal to sales, then absorption costing and variable costing will give the same amount of net income.



b. When production is greater than sales, then Net Income under absorption costing will be greater than net income under variable costing because a portion of the fixed costs was deferred to other years under the absorption method.



c. When production is less than sales, then Net Income under absorption costing will be less than net income under variable costing because a portion of the fixed costs that were deferred from previous years will be absorbed into this years cost of goods sold.



d. The value of inventory will be greater under the absorption method because of the deferred costs, however the total unit count will be the same for each accounting method.



e. Over the long-term, net income will be equal under both methods.



If sales are constant and production is variable then:



a. Net income under variable costing is not influenced by the fluctuations in sales (given a constant production) because none of the fixed manufacturing costs are deferred.



b. Net income under absorption costing is influenced by the fluctuations in sales (given a constant production) because a portion of the fixed manufacturing costs are deferred and may be used each year to increase costs.



Should Fixed Manufacturing Costs be Included in Inventories?



Advocates of full costing say yes, because all of the production costs are needed to create the products. Thus, they have "future economic benefits."



Advocates of variable costing argue that in order for a fixed manufacturing cost to be an asset, it has to meet a "future cost avoidance" criteria much the same way as prepaid insurance. In the case of fixed manufacturing costs, they do not meet this criteria because they are incurred each time the production line opens. Thus, they need to be expenses in that period and only variance expenses inventoried.



Problems with absorption costing also include potential manipulations by plant managers such as increasing production regardless of sales levels to defer costs to the next year and show a higher current profit for the sake of bonuses and promotions



Example of Absorption versus Variable Costing Data

Units Produced 200,000
Sales Price $15.00
Direct Materials Cost per Unit $4.00
Direct Labor Cost Per Unit $3.00
Variable Manufacturing Cost Per unit $2.00
Variable Sales Cost per Unit $1.00
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead $200,000
Fixed Selling Costs $100,000


Unit Cost Under Absorption Costing:

Data

Direct Materials Cost per Unit
Direct Labor Cost Per Unit
Variable Manufacturing Cost Per unit
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead Per unit


Unit Cost Under Variable Costing:



Direct Materials Cost per Unit
Direct Labor Cost Per Unit
Variable Manufacturing Cost Per unit

Total Cost Per Unit





Income statement under Absorption if only 180,000 units were sold:

Sales
Cost of Goods Sold
Beginning Inventory
Cost of Goods Manufactured
Goods Available for Sale
Ending Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold
Gross Profit
Variable Selling
Fixed Selling
Net Income


Income statement under Variable Costing if 180,000 units were sold:



Sales
Cost of Goods Sold
Beginning Inventory
Cost of Goods Manufactured
Goods Available for Sale
Ending Inventory
Variable Cost of Goods Sold
Variable Selling
Total Variable Costs
Contribution Margin
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead
Fixed Selling
Net Income


Reconciliation:

Example of Absorption versus Variable Costing -- Answer

Data

Units Produced 200,000
Sales Price $15.00
Direct Materials Cost per Unit $4.00
Direct Labor Cost Per Unit $3.00
Variable Manufacturing Cost Per unit $2.00
Variable Sales Cost per Unit $1.00
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead $200,000
Fixed Selling Costs $100,000


Unit Cost Under Absorption Costing:

Data

Direct Materials Cost per Unit $4.00
Direct Labor Cost Per Unit $3.00
Variable Manufacturing Cost Per unit $2.00
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead Per unit $200,000/ 200,000 units $1.00

$10.00



Unit Cost Under Variable Costing:



Direct Materials Cost per Unit $4.00
Direct Labor Cost Per Unit $3.00
Variable Manufacturing Cost Per unit $2.00

Total Cost Per Unit

$9.00



Target Profit ---- $150,000 Tax Rate --- 40%



Income statement under Absorption if only 180,000 units were sold:

Sales 15 x 180,000 units $2,700,000
Cost of Goods Sold
Beginning Inventory 0
Cost of Goods Manufactured $10 x 200,000 $2,000,000
Goods Available for Sale 2,000,000
Ending Inventory $10 x 20,000 200,000
Cost of Goods Sold 1,800,000
Gross Profit 900,000
Variable Selling $1 x 180,000 180,000
Fixed Selling 100,000
Net Income $620,000


Income statement under Variable Costing if 180,000 units were sold:



Sales 15 x 180,000 units $2,700,000
Cost of Goods Sold
Beginning Inventory 0
Cost of Goods Manufactured $9 x 200,000 $1,800,000
Goods Available for Sale 1,800,000
Ending Inventory $9 x 20,000 180,000
Variable Cost of Goods Sold 1,620,000
Variable Selling $1 x 180,000 180,000
Total Variable Costs 1,800,000
Contribution Margin 900,000
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead 200,000
Fixed Selling 100,000
Net Income $600,000


Reconciliation: $620,000 - $600,000 = $20,000/20,000 units = The $1.00 per unit difference in inventory costs. Essentially $20,000 [20,000 units x $1.00] in costs were deferred to the next accounting period under Absorption costing.